Quick Action

Contact Congress


They said it: Broadcasters are talking out of both sides of their mouths

12 June 2019

Last week the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) was on Capitol Hill arguing against the reauthorization of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (STELA) in House and Senate hearings.

As a background, STELA is a piece of legislation that allows satellite TV companies to license and transmit broadcasters’ content to underserved markets through use of a compulsory license.

As a coalition representing music creators, we don’t necessarily have a dog in the TV content fight. But when the number one opponent of a performance right for music played on AM/FM radio is petitioning Congress to protect TV content on various platforms, it is our duty to call out the hypocrisy.

While appearing before committees in the House and Senate, Gordon Smith, president of the NAB, stood up for TV content creators. In the direct quotes below he is using the same points we make for a performance right on radio, but here he’s advocating for TV content. It appears that Mr. Smith took a page out of our own book!

“What we’d appreciate is the opportunity to negotiate in a free market for rates for our work.” – Gordon Smith, NAB

As music creators, we want a seat at the table too. We would like businesses to get consent to use our content, and when they use it, we want to be paid fairly for it. The NAB is denying us of that right while all other music listening services are paying artists for their work.

“Where others try to sell our product to their advantage, we are entitled to retransmission consent.” – Gordon Smith, NAB

If the NAB feels entitled to payment for TV content, why do they not extend that same concept, fair pay for work, to music content aired on terrestrial radio?

“The time has come to stop subsidizing billion-dollar satellite companies.” – Gordon Smith, NAB

Broadcast radio, a $17 billion-dollar industry, is making a lot of money from music content, and without having to pay music creators for it, they’re essentially getting it for free, the very definition of a subsidy.

All of this doublespeak begs the question, why is the NAB picking winners and losers? Mr. Smith stood up for TV content creators while leaving music creators in the dark. musicFIRST believes all content creators deserve fair pay for their work.

Get Involved!

Contact your Members of Congress and tell them you stand against Big Radio.

Contact congress
Back to Latest


iHeart Doesn't Know What Local Means
February 28, 2020
No Heart Radio:
February 14, 2020
Blog Post
AM/FM Act Playlist
February 06, 2020
Press Release
What Others Are Saying About the AM-FM Act
November 25, 2019
Press Release
musicFIRST Applauds Bill Giving Artists Say Before T...
November 21, 2019
Press Release
The Ask Musicians for Music (AM/FM) Act of 2019
November 21, 2019
Press Release
Broadcasters to Congress: “We Want Consent”
November 21, 2019
Blog Post
LRFA Translator: Revealing the Truth Behind NAB Speak
August 12, 2019
ICYMI – NPR Reports on the Consequences of Loosening...
June 14, 2019
Stay in the Loop


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: musicFIRST Coalition, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington DC, DC, 20002, http://musicfirstcoalition.org. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
By submitting you agree to our Terms & Conditions